Justine Skye recently found herself embroiled in a rather absurd fan feud that escalated to social media proportions, prompting her to address the situation on Twitter. Here’s what went down: an unauthorized user gained access to Justine’s Snapchat account and proceeded to take aim at Selena Gomez. The hacker kicked off with a post poking fun at Selena’s TikTok activity, quipping, “Making TikToks every day like you haven’t got a messy makeup brand to run. Just whack as hell.” Additionally, a photo of Justine and her close friend Hailey Bieber was shared, accompanied by the caption, “Throwback with wifey. I’ll protect her at all costs.”
As these posts circulated, Selena’s fans launched a barrage of attacks against Justine. One Twitter user jabbed, “Making TikToks every day like you haven’t got a flop music career to worry about. Hmm. Just whack as hell.” Another chimed in, “Justine, focus on your own career instead of fixating on Selena. She’s sitting pretty on her Million Dollar Empire, while you’re just a sad, jealous mess.” A third tweet criticized Justine’s career trajectory, citing her alleged plastic surgery and lack of chart-toppers after almost a decade in the industry. The onslaught continued, with some questioning Justine’s audacity to speak about Selena at all. The onslaught wasn’t limited to Justine; Hailey Bieber also found herself targeted by Selena’s fervent fanbase.

Even if you’re not up to speed, there’s still this ongoing intense rivalry between fans of Selena Gomez and Hailey Bieber. It all stems from the fact that both Selena and Hailey had romantic involvements with Justin Bieber. To this day, some Selena fans cling to the idea that Justin should be with Selena, despite his current marriage to Hailey. There’s also a faction of fans who speculate that Hailey harbors hidden jealousy toward Selena, alleging that she utilizes her friendship with Justine Skye to undermine Selena. The entire situation devolves into senseless online conflict, with people eagerly waiting to pounce on someone for no valid reason. Unfortunately, Justine has become a target in this unnecessary feud.
It seems like Justine recently had to deal with some drama caused by a hacking incident. She clarified that she hadn’t posted on Snapchat in years, so any recent controversial posts weren’t from her. Justine expressed frustration over baseless rumors and reassured everyone that she harbored no ill will towards Selena Gomez. She emphasized her focus on positivity and support for others in the industry. Despite facing online negativity, Justine stays grounded with her faith and supportive friends. She urged people to consider the impact of their words online and emphasized the need for kindness.
As for Justine’s career, she’s carving her path with various projects, including collaborations with brands, acting, and pursuing music as an independent artist. Her latest single, “What a Lie,” showcases her talent and dedication. While she may not have the largest following, she’s committed to her craft and has a loyal fan base. Instead of criticizing, people should acknowledge her hard work and respect her journey.
Mo’Nique and D.L. Hughley’s feud continues to make headlines!
Let’s dive into the ongoing drama between Mo’Nique and D.L. Hughley. While I touched on this in my last video, there have been recent developments worth mentioning. D.L. Hughley attempted to discredit Mo’Nique, but she came prepared with concrete evidence to support her claims.
For those unfamiliar with the backstory, Mo’Nique and D.L. Hughley were slated to perform together at a comedy show. However, a disagreement arose regarding who would headline the event. Mo’Nique asserted that she was originally designated as the headliner, as per her contract. However, D.L. Hughley purportedly objected and sought to alter the terms, effectively assuming the headlining position.

Why is headlining such a contentious issue? Well, being the headliner holds significant weight in the entertainment industry. The headliner is the star attraction, closing out the show and drawing in the largest crowds. It’s not just about ego; it’s also about financial compensation, as the headliner typically commands the highest pay.
D.L. Hughley shared a screenshot of the contract on March 29th, emphasizing the date for clarity. According to the contract, he was slated to be the highest-paid artist, control the lineup, and serve as the closing performer, effectively positioning him as the headliner. In his caption, he underscored the importance of relying on factual evidence rather than personal opinions, suggesting that any discrepancies should be addressed with the promoter or management teams involved.
The feud between Mo’Nique and D.L. Hughley underscores the complexities and power dynamics within the entertainment industry, where contractual disputes can quickly escalate into public spats.

Mo’Nique has presented evidence supporting her claims. She signed her contract on March 28th, a day prior to D.L. Hughley’s contract being finalized on March 29th. Analyzing Mo’Nique’s contract reveals that she was intended to be the headliner for the show, with specific performance terms outlined. Mo’Nique substantiated her assertions by providing email correspondences and the original schedule, confirming her position as the closing act. In her statement, she highlighted the importance of transparency and integrity, contrasting her signed agreement with the absence of signatures on D.L. Hughley’s deal memo. She emphasized the need for authenticity and questioned the validity of a deal memo lacking participant signatures.
Mo’Nique’s revelation suggests discrepancies in the event’s organization, particularly concerning the roles of headlining comedians. While Mo’Nique’s integrity remains intact, scrutiny shifts towards the promoters for their handling of contractual obligations. Despite potential misunderstandings, Mo’Nique’s frustration stems from what she perceives as repeated disrespect in the industry. She has consistently advocated for herself, confronting instances of mistreatment.
While acknowledging Mo’Nique’s stance, it becomes apparent that the dispute’s core lies with the promoters rather than D.L. Hughley. Although D.L. may have unknowingly been placed in the headlining position, the promoters should have honored Mo’Nique’s pre-existing agreement. This discrepancy underscores a broader issue of integrity and fairness within the entertainment industry, highlighting the need for clearer communication and adherence to contractual obligations.

The resolution of this conflict hinges on a mutual understanding between Mo’Nique, D.L. Hughley, and the promoters. It is essential for all parties involved to address the situation with professionalism and respect. Moving forward, clarity and respect for contractual agreements are paramount to avoiding similar disputes.
What are your thoughts on this situation? Feel free to share your opinions in the comments section below. Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe, and share this video if you found it insightful. Thank you for watching, and until next time, take care!