The Kardashians are at it again, this time trying to cash in by selling their used clothes at ridiculously high prices. Take Khloe, for example—she once had a pair of $7.99 children’s leggings listed for $20, plus $15 shipping. It’s hard not to see this as a total rip-off. So, let’s break this down.
We all appreciate a good hustle—people who work hard and get rewarded for it. But when it comes to the Kardashians, they’ve really crossed the line with their Kardashian Closet. It’s mind-blowing that these billionaires are reselling their old clothes when they have so much money already. It seems pretty pointless.
Kardashian Closet is pitched as a high-end resale site that offers clothing from the Kardashian-Jenner family’s personal wardrobe. Right from the get-go, I’m skeptical. These clothes are customized for their specific body types, so they might not fit most people. Unless you’re a huge fan or are looking at accessories, I don’t see how these clothes would be practical for the average buyer.
The site claims each item is hand-picked by the family members, though they likely have stylists involved. The idea is to let fans own a piece of Kardashian-Jenner history, but it feels more like a marketing ploy. You’re not just buying a luxury item—you’re paying for something that was once worn by a Kardashian. The site even organizes items by family member, with sections for Kim, her sisters, and their mom. There’s even a section for kids’ clothes, which seems a bit strange, featuring items previously worn by the Kardashian-Jenner children.
Is it really necessary for some people to be collecting kids’ clothes? Sure, there are some pieces listed for as low as $20, but most of the stuff on the site is ridiculously high-end, even though it’s secondhand. Why not just donate these clothes to homeless kids or women’s shelters? In my hometown, there’s a battered women’s shelter where you can drop off clothes. It would be great if the Kardashians did that, but instead, they’re selling these items so fans can feel like they own a piece of their lives.
This isn’t the first time their closet has sparked controversy. Not only are they billionaires and millionaires, but they also get designer pieces and promotional packages for free. Now they’re reselling them, which seems pretty off. Recently, there’s been chatter about the Kardashians needing money after some recent drama with Kim and Kylie. Khloe’s been getting heat for selling her daughter’s clothes at outrageous prices. It’s unsettling to think these clothes might end up with people who have questionable motives. I really hope they’re going to families who need them, but it’s strange to think who’s shopping for kids’ clothes on this site.
And just last week, fans were buzzing after Kim Kardashian tried to sell a Birkin bag with some discoloration and scratches for nearly $770,000. Birkin bags are like investments and can be cleaned for free by Birkin, but Kim chose to sell this worn one instead. Even though she’s one of the richest and most famous people in the world, reaching billionaire status in 2021, it seems like she’s still clinging to some of her old money-making schemes. While that can sometimes work out, this just feels like a scheme.
The alligator leather Birkin, which is listed as being in good condition, has a few issues you should know about. The description mentions some discoloration on the handles and corners, and a minor scratch on the metal. The photos reveal a lot of staining, especially on the handles, which are visibly brown—probably from body tanner. It’s a bit off-putting, to say the least. Who’s going to drop $70,000 on a bag that looks like this? One Reddit user was clearly horrified, posting, “Kim’s dirty Birkin could be yours for only $70K,” and adding, “Seriously, how desperate are they for money?” Another commenter was even more blunt: “This is so embarrassing. Why don’t they get it cleaned or restored before selling it? The hardware is all scuffed and dull, the edges are worn and frayed, and it’s stained from makeup and tanner. Anyone buying this is making a huge mistake. They couldn’t even be bothered to properly restore it or store it right.”
Kimberly hasn’t addressed the backlash, but the bag is still listed for a staggering $669,000, plus $15 for shipping—not even free shipping, which most brands offer on purchases over $100 or $200. The bag is a Birkin 30 in light gray alligator with gold hardware. From the pictures, it’s clear that it’s in pretty rough shape, with significant staining and worn hardware.
And there’s one more thing to consider: the bag doesn’t come with a site certificate. For those who aren’t familiar, international laws about exotic leathers are quite strict. Without the proper certificate, it’s illegal to transport the bag across state lines. This means you can only ship it within the U.S. If you try to take it out of state without the certificate, it could be seized and destroyed. Paying $70,000 for a bag you can’t take out of the country seems pretty crazy. The regulations are strict, making it a difficult purchase, especially if you travel or plan to maintain it.
Our team looked at the bag and quoted it at $35,000 or £28,000—about half of what Kim is asking. It’s hard to justify paying double for a used, dirty bag, even if it’s a luxury item. Most people who can afford such things would probably just buy a new one.
Khloé Kardashian is getting some serious heat for selling her daughter’s used clothes at sky-high prices. Fans were outraged when they saw items priced in the hundreds, wondering why anyone would shell out so much for kids’ clothing, which they outgrow so fast. Khloé even promoted these items on her social media, reminiscing about how she missed seeing her daughter True in them, which struck many as a bit strange.
Things heated up even more when people realized the markup on some items. For example, a Goni sweater and a Balmain skirt, which originally cost $495 each, were listed for around half of that on sale. An Oscar de la Renta dress was priced at $395, and a pair of Gucci tennis shoes went for $250. The priciest item was a secondhand Aristocrat Kids dress, initially listed at $695 but later discounted to $556.
But the real uproar came from a pair of True’s old Cat & Jack tights. These were being sold for $20, even though they’re just $6 at Target. Add in $14 for shipping, and you’re looking at $35 for leggings that normally cost $7. Many found this markup to be a bit much and suggested that instead of reselling them, Khloé should donate the clothes to those in need.
This isn’t the first time Khloé has faced criticism. Back in June 2020, she was called out by designer Christian Cohen for selling a loaned runway sample for $1,300. The designer publicly questioned why his sample was being sold on her site, and shortly after, the dress was removed. This incident, along with the current controversy, has led some to question whether the Kardashians are as charitable as they appear or if their wealth is more about appearance than reality.
So, here’s a juicy tidbit: after Kim Kardashian’s used Birkin bag made headlines, Kylie Jenner found herself in hot water for a different reason. A small business owner named Amy claimed that despite Kylie expressing interest and checking out prices beforehand, she allegedly didn’t have the budget for one of Amy’s cakes. It’s pretty surprising, given Kylie’s reputation for wealth—one would think she could easily cover such a cost, especially with the income from her Kardashian closet.
Before we dive into Amy’s story, let’s take a quick look at the Kardashian closet website. It’s got all sorts of items from the Kardashians’ personal collections. There are shoes in various sizes, some rare and new Nike sneakers for kids—kind of odd to see kids’ clothes listed here, but let’s move on to Kylie’s section.
Kylie’s part of the site includes a range of items and even some bios. I spotted a $3,000 bag that looks in much better condition than some other pieces. There are also high-end items like Dior and Air Jordans, with prices hitting around $5,000. It’s definitely high-end, but no men’s section seems to be included.
Now, back to Amy’s situation. She shared on Instagram that an event planning company contacted her on Kylie’s behalf. Amy explained her prices right away and even cleared her schedule to accommodate the cake order. She was even willing to sync her trip with a pop-up event in LA to cover her travel expenses. Despite all this, she was later told by Kylie’s team that they couldn’t fit her cake into their budget.
Amy was pretty upset and posted about it online, which might not look great for her business. She felt it was unfair, considering how much time she had invested in creating a detailed pitch. After Kylie’s team said they couldn’t afford her cake, Amy’s post went viral, attracting a lot of attention. She was eventually asked to take down her Instagram stories, but she hadn’t signed an NDA, so she felt she had a right to share her experience.
After getting a flood of responses and seeing that her story resonated with many in creative fields, Amy decided to take down the posts but felt reassured by the support she received. She learned a valuable lesson: no more free pitches, and always get a deposit or consulting fee upfront. Amy’s not just a small-time baker anymore; she’s running a successful full-time business and has a solid client base. It’ll be interesting to see how Kylie handles situations like this in the future.
So, I saw this thread on Reddit where someone said, “With all the fancy parties they throw, you’d think they could spend a bit more on a cake. Guess they’re still too cheap.” Another person chimed in with, “That’s pretty embarrassing for the family,” and someone else said, “A billionaire who can’t even spring for a cake? That’s just sad.” Maybe they’re just really smart with their money—after all, people get rich by being good at making and keeping it. Still, it does come off as a bit desperate.
Anyway, I hope you enjoyed this video! What do you think of our latest show? We dropped a new episode yesterday with a fun vlog segment. If you haven’t checked it out yet, definitely give it a look. There are two episodes up so far, and you can find them in my playlist. This is a brand-new series on the channel, so I’d love to hear your thoughts.