Hey, everyone! Welcome. Recently, Amanda Seal had a chat with Shannon Sharp on his Club Sh Shay show. Whenever someone talks with Shannon, you know there’s some juicy gossip about to spill out and someone’s about to be called out. Well, this interview was no exception as Amanda dished about her disagreement with her former colleague from Insecure, Issa Rae. But her real bone of contention was with Issa’s publicist, Vanessa Anderson. Amanda felt Vanessa was disrespectful and she wasn’t fond of her. Despite tolerating it, things reached a boiling point when Amanda attended a black Emmys party hosted by Vanessa. Though she was invited as a plus one, Amanda found herself escorted out by four security guards at Vanessa’s behest. Naturally, Amanda was livid and vented about it online a while back. Following her rant, she faced backlash from black media and found herself excluded from certain circles. She believes Vanessa is behind this. Additionally, Amanda was disappointed that Issa Rae didn’t intervene sooner. She felt Issa didn’t stand up for her or support her throughout the ordeal. Issa appeared to maintain a hands-off approach to the whole situation.

There was this moment when Issa tried to step in, attempting to facilitate a conversation between Amanda and Vanessa. Unfortunately, it didn’t go smoothly, and things remained awkward between them afterward. Issa, to be honest, tends to feel a bit awkward herself. She’s not one to seek out drama and isn’t particularly confrontational. With all the things she’s juggling, she likely saw the issue between Amanda and her publicist as trivial, thinking, “I have no interest in being involved in this drama. Just leave me out of it, okay?” But Amanda wasn’t pleased with that response. She felt like Issa didn’t have her back and called her out on Club Sh.

I remember talking to Issa about it, expressing my confusion about what was going on with her publicist and how it seemed like there was tension. But Issa was like, “That’s your thing to sort out.” I said, “Well, it’s not really between us because I don’t have any issue with her, but she seems to have one with me.” And she replied, “That’s none of my business.” Eventually, at the end of season 1, I pulled Issa aside after an event and suggested we go to dinner. During dinner, I brought up my feeling that she might think I had something against her, which puzzled me because we’d always been cool. She admitted to feeling similarly, based on some misunderstanding. So, we agreed to start fresh because that wasn’t the case. But as the show progressed, there were instances where I felt like I was always expected to be the bigger person, diffusing tensions. By season five, she crossed a line one too many times, and I decided to step back from the situation. It became clear that she wasn’t supportive or empowering, and she didn’t feel the need to protect me. This is just a glimpse of what happened, but that was my experience.
Amanda clearly felt let down by Issa’s lack of support in those instances. The conversation they had about their mutual dislike was intriguing because each felt the other wasn’t reciprocating their feelings. Issa never broached the topic until Amanda initiated it during an outing. It highlighted their differing approaches to conflict resolution; Amanda confronts issues directly, while Issa tends to avoid confrontation. Amanda, being outspoken, expected Issa to stand up for her, but Issa’s passive demeanor disappointed her, especially after the Emmys party incident. Returning to the set of Insecure, Amanda felt isolated, and it took Issa a while to acknowledge her feelings. Eventually, Amanda confronted Issa, expressing the toll the situation was taking on her mental health. It took multiple conversations for Issa to acknowledge Amanda’s distress. However, labeling Issa as a villain isn’t fair; both women need to adjust how they handle conflict. Confrontation isn’t always the best approach, but neither is avoidance. Finding a middle ground is essential.

It seems there’s been quite a buzz surrounding Megan Thee Stallion’s legal entanglement with her former cameraman, Emilio Garcia. Reports of unpaid wages and claims of a toxic work environment have been making headlines this week. Garcia has taken legal action against Megan, alleging not only financial discrepancies but also detailing disturbing incidents of workplace misconduct.

Among Garcia’s accusations is the claim that during a tour in Asta, Spain, in June 2022, he found himself in an uncomfortable situation. Following a night out, Garcia, Megan, and three other women were traveling together in an SUV when Megan and one of the women engaged in sexual activity right beside him. Trapped in a moving vehicle in an unfamiliar location, Garcia felt embarrassed, mortified, and offended throughout the ordeal.

The day after, Megan confronted Garcia about his presence in the SUV the previous night and warned him not to discuss what he witnessed. Additionally, Garcia alleges that Megan subjected him to fat-shaming remarks, further exacerbating the hostile work environment.

These allegations are indeed startling, but Garcia may need to substantiate his claims with evidence for them to hold weight legally. Without proof, his accusations might not have the impact he desires.



I’m not inclined to brush off these accusations lightly, as I believe Megan has a tendency to blur professional boundaries with her colleagues. For instance, there’s a video circulating of her dancing intimately with her hairstylist, Colon. While he appeared unperturbed, such behavior is undoubtedly unprofessional. Megan’s propensity to view her employees more as friends than as workers is evident in her actions. She doesn’t seem to hesitate to drink excessively or engage in suggestive behavior around them. This attitude can lead to serious issues, as her conduct could easily be construed as harassment or even assault.

It’s worth noting that her employees also play a role in entertaining such behavior. However, Megan needs to exercise caution, as her actions could have serious repercussions. Allegations of engaging in sexual activity in front of her cameraman without consent are deeply concerning and wholly inappropriate, regardless of their friendship. Furthermore, allegations of fat-shaming and fostering a toxic work environment add to the gravity of the situation.

Comparisons to similar allegations against Lizzo highlight a double standard in how public opinion is swayed. Despite facing similar accusations, Lizzo didn’t engage in behavior as extreme as Megan’s alleged actions. Yet, Megan seems to receive more sympathy and support, underscoring the subjective nature of public opinion.

Returning to the lawsuit, it’s troubling to learn that the plaintiff contemplated quitting due to Megan’s possessiveness and inadequate compensation for their time. These factors paint a concerning picture of the work environment under Megan’s management.

Later that evening, Stallion, inebriated, initiated a FaceTime call with the plaintiff. During the conversation, the plaintiff voiced his concerns regarding being underpaid for the hours he worked, to which they seemingly reached a resolution, with Stallion reassuring, “We’re good.” Despite this understanding, the plaintiff remained scheduled to work at Stallion’s upcoming event the following Friday. However, around June 2023, Roc Nation unexpectedly contacted the plaintiff on the eve of the scheduled event, informing him that his services were no longer needed by Stallion. Emilio’s primary grievance revolves around his termination and alleged inadequate compensation for his work with Megan Thee Stallion.

In the lawsuit, Emilio contends that he worked long hours, often at odd times of the day, responding to Stallion’s requests for edits and additional work without receiving proper compensation. He claims that his hours were not accurately recorded due to being misclassified as an independent contractor rather than an employee. According to the lawsuit, Stallion exerted significant control over the plaintiff’s work, regularly contacting him at all hours to assign tasks, including brainstorming TikTok ideas and completing various assignments. Stallion allegedly forbade the plaintiff from working with other clients, indicating possessiveness over his services as her personal cameraman.

This exclusivity requirement hindered Emilio’s ability to expand his client base, unlike the situation with Megan’s former hairstylist, Jonathan, who faced similar constraints but eventually chose to pursue other opportunities despite potential repercussions to his relationship with Megan. Emilio, however, found it challenging to establish himself beyond being known solely as Megan’s cameraman, a situation allegedly encouraged by Megan herself.

Emilio expressed frustration over missed opportunities and reduced pay, attributing the latter to alleged interference by Roc Nation’s CEO, Desiree Perez. His grievances extend to perceived injustices in his termination and compensation, evident in his social media posts and interactions with others in the industry. However, Megan’s legal team, represented by Alex Sparrow, has countered Emilio’s claims, portraying them as a mere money grab devoid of merit. They have vowed to address the matter through legal channels.

The outcome of this dispute remains uncertain, with potential scenarios ranging from a settlement to a protracted legal battle. Emilio’s allegations against Megan and Roc Nation may face scrutiny in court, particularly given the formidable legal representation on Megan’s side. Nonetheless, the controversy highlights broader issues of employment classification and fair compensation within the entertainment industry.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *